Most of the attention has been on the budget for the past few weeks but some legislation has moved through the House and Senate.
HB 230, Clarify Read to Achieve/School Performance Grades (Malone, Martin, Brody, Samuelson). HB 230 amends the Read to Achieve law passed last year to make several modifications, including clarifying the good cause exemptions from mandatory retention for Limited English Proficient students and students with IEPs (a more detailed summary is in the June 6th post). The legislation has been signed by the Governor and is S.L. 2014-5.
Education
HB 230, Clarify Read to Achieve/School Performance Grades (Malone, Martin, Brody, Samuelson). HB 230 amends the Read to Achieve law passed last year to make several modifications, including clarifying the good cause exemptions from mandatory retention for Limited English Proficient students and students with IEPs (a more detailed summary is in the June 6th post). The legislation has been signed by the Governor and is S.L. 2014-5.
Common Core Legislation: HB 1061,
Replace Common Core State Standards with NC's Higher Academic Standards (Holloway, Pittman, Speciale) and SB 812, Maintain
State Authority over Academic Standards (Soucek, Tillman). The House and
Senate both passed bills to replace or modify the Common Core standards being
used in North Carolina schools. Each bill would set up an Academic Standards
Review Commission that would study North Carolina’s current academic standards
and then recommend changes to the State Board of Education. The Senate version
appears to allow the Commission and Board of Education to consider Common Core
as the basis for North Carolina’s future standards, but the House version would
not. The NC Chamber, which has been opposed to the repeal of the standards,
came out in favor of the Senate version. The House Education committee took up
the Senate version this week but simply put its own language into the Senate
bill, which will eventually set the bill up for a conference committee where
the House and Senate can work out a compromise.
HB712, Clarifying Changes/Special Ed Scholarships (Glazier, Stam, Jackson).
HB 712 clarifies the Special Education scholarships for children with
disabilities and exempts certain schools from child care licensure
requirements. It clarifies the definition of a qualifying child and includes
related services and educational technology as reimbursable. The child care licensure
portion exempts private schools that operate child care facilities
from state licensure. It has been approved by the full Senate and has been sent
back to the House for concurrence.
Health
and Human Services
HB 1181, Partnership for a Healthy North Carolina
(Dollar, Burr, Avila, Lambeth). As filed, this bill would initiate Gov.
McCrory’s Medicaid reform package by directing DHHS to begin setting up a
system of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). However, the House released a
new proposal this week that sets up a path toward Medicaid reform that tracks
with the Governor’s proposal, but also concedes an important provision to the
Senate, which could pave the way for a budget compromise. The bill now calls
for provider-led organizations to manage and coordinate the majority of the
Medicaid population. However, the House proposal also states that the system
should be fully capitated by 2020. A "fully capitated system" means
that provider-run organizations would get a finite amount of money to serve a defined
population, leaving providers with all of the risk of going over budget and all
the savings of staying under budget. While the Senate prefers a single private
managed care entity, a capitated provider-led system might be the next best
thing for them. The proposal keeps full control of administration with the
Division of Medical Assistance. The proposal does not explicitly address the
role of the LME/MCOs but does propose a controversial pilot for one LME/MCO,
Cardinal Innovations, to manage the physical and behavioral health care for
certain individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. House
Bill 1181 passed the House Health and Human Services Committee on Thursday and
has been referred to the House Appropriations Committee.
Elections
SB
403, Omnibus Election Clarifications (Bingham).
SB 403 makes a number of changes to the voting laws, from eligibility to file
for office after switching parties to filing requirements. One section adds a
provision to the current law regarding the procedure for voting absentee
ballots to ensure that the failure of a witness to list a zip code does not
invalidate the application and certificate. It was approved by the House
Election committee this week and will be voted on by the full House next week.
Other
Issues
HB 1069,
Unemployment Insurance Law Changes (Howard,
Warren, Arp). HB 1069 seeks to amend the
Unemployment Insurance laws, including requiring photo ID for benefits; sets
benefit duration according to the unemployment rate; modifies the work search
requirement by increasing the number of job contacts to 5 per week and
eliminating the requirement to search on 2 different days. The bill has been
approved by both chambers and awaits the signature of the Governor.
SB 493, 2014 Regulatory Reform Act (Walters).
SB 493 was brought forward in House committee this week with a number of unrelated
policy proposals, including many items that already passed the House. These
items include the ban on tanning beds for children under 18 and Autism
insurance. The bill was calendared for the House floor on Wednesday, but was
referred back to committee after members of both parties expressed concern
about the bill’s process and content. It remains in the Regulatory Reform
Committee.
SB594, Omnibus Justice Amendments (Davis). SB 594 was approved by the House Judiciary C
committee this week. The bill makes a number of changes to the criminal
statutes. Of note to Disability Rights NC is a section that amends our state
law to conform to the US Supreme Court decision in Hall v. Florida, in which
the Supreme Court held that states must take into account more than a hard and
fast IQ number in determining whether an individual has an intellectual
disability for purposes of capital punishment. The bill has been referred to
Appropriations.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We are eager to hear your feedback on our policy blog posts! However, we would like to ask that conversation remain civil. Avoid offensive, vulgar or hateful language and please be respectful of all viewpoints and opinions, even if they may differ from your own. We do not monitor each and every posting, but we reserve the right to delete comments that violate our policy.