In addition to continued finagling on the budget, the House and Senate continued work on substantive legislation this week. For news on the House proposal to pass a "mini" budget, see my post earlier today. That mini budget does nothing to get the House and Senate closer to a consensus number on Medicaid costs - see this North Carolina Health News piece and the Office of State Budget and Management presentation to the Senate Appropriations committee for more information. See below for news on legislation.
HB 1220, Hope for Haley and Friends (McElraft, Avila, Carney,
Fulghum). HB 1220 will allow a hemp oil
extract to be used for treatment of seizure disorders. It does require the creation of a database of
pilot studies of the extract and registration of neurologists conducting the
studies. The dispensing neurologists
will be immune from criminal penalties for dispensing the extract, as will
those in possession of it for treatment purposes. It also allows UNC and ECU (and encourages
the private universities of Duke and Wake Forest) to conduct clinical research on
the hemp extract. It was approved by the Senate this week and the full House
concurred in the Senate Committee Substitute.
It is expected to be signed by the Governor soon.
Education
SB 812, Maintain State Authority over Academic Standards(Soucek, Tillman). The House passed its changes to the Senate Common Core bill this week. As expected, the Senate did not concur in the House Committee Substitute and the bill will now go to conference for the two chambers to hash out their differences.
HB 712, Clarifying Changes/Special Ed Scholarships(Glazier, Stam, Jackson). HB 712 clarifies the Special Education scholarships for children with disabilities and exempts certain schools from child care licensure requirements. The House concurred in the Senate committee substitute this week. It has been presented to the Governor for his signature.
Justice and Public Safety
SB 594, Omnibus Justice Amendments (Davis). SB 594 includes a section that amends our state law to conform to the US Supreme Court decision in Hall v. Florida, in which the Supreme Court held that states must take into account more than a hard and fast IQ number in determining whether an individual has an intellectual disability for purposes of capital punishment. SB 594 was approved by the full House this week but still needs one more final vote before going to the Senate. Many of the provisions unrelated to Hall were removed, but the budget provision moving the SBI to Public Safety was added.
Health and Human Services
Education
SB 812, Maintain State Authority over Academic Standards(Soucek, Tillman). The House passed its changes to the Senate Common Core bill this week. As expected, the Senate did not concur in the House Committee Substitute and the bill will now go to conference for the two chambers to hash out their differences.
HB 712, Clarifying Changes/Special Ed Scholarships(Glazier, Stam, Jackson). HB 712 clarifies the Special Education scholarships for children with disabilities and exempts certain schools from child care licensure requirements. The House concurred in the Senate committee substitute this week. It has been presented to the Governor for his signature.
Justice and Public Safety
SB 594, Omnibus Justice Amendments (Davis). SB 594 includes a section that amends our state law to conform to the US Supreme Court decision in Hall v. Florida, in which the Supreme Court held that states must take into account more than a hard and fast IQ number in determining whether an individual has an intellectual disability for purposes of capital punishment. SB 594 was approved by the full House this week but still needs one more final vote before going to the Senate. Many of the provisions unrelated to Hall were removed, but the budget provision moving the SBI to Public Safety was added.
SB 793, Charter School
Modifications (Tillman, Cook). SB 793 makes several modifications to the
charter school law: it provides that a teacher employed by a charter school may serve as a
nonvoting member of the board of directors for the charter school; moves the date by which the state board shall
make decisions on applications from January 15 to August 15; amends the current
law regarding expansion of grades of a charter school; allows priority enrollment
for the children of board members; makes charter schools subject to open
meetings and public records laws; allows charter schools to ask for additional
records regarding the transfer of the per pupil share of the local current
expense fund; to shorten the time period for payment of delinquent funds; to
clarify the bidding process for the assumption of charter schools; and to
direct the state board to develop a fast-track approval process. The bill also makes changes to the
anti-discrimination provision in the charter school statute. It deletes the portion of the current law
that states that a charter school shall not discriminate on the basis of
ethnicity, national origin, gender or disability. It adds a new provision that
states that a charter school shall not discriminate with respect to “any
category protected under the US Constitution or under federal law applicable to
the states.” It also adds that a charter school whose mission is single gender
education may limit admission on the basis of gender. The bill was approved by
the full House this week after much controversy over the anti-discrmination
provisions. It will now go back to the
Senate for concurrence. If the Senate
does not concur, then the bill will go into conference.
Regulatory Reform
The regulatory reform measures discussed last week were divided
into two measures this week and approved by the full House. Both bills will now
proceed to the Senate for concurrence.
SB 493, Health and Safety Reg Reform (Walters). SB 493 contains a
number or policy items, many of which have already been passed or included in
other legislation. As it passed the House, the bill contains the Autism
Insurance and related behavioral analyst licensure language; a new Pharmacy Benefits
Management Act; the ban on tanning bed use for those under 18; amendments to the
Nursing Home Administrator Act; language related to aligning provider oversight
and extending the Medicaid re-credentialing period; removes the sunset on a provision
allowing electronic monitoring in facilities for children and adolescents who have a primary
diagnosis of mental illness and/or emotional disturbance; interstate
connectivity for controlled substance reporting; and parity for oral cancer
treatment drugs. It also includes
language proposed elsewhere regarding Special Care Units – shortening the
moratorium on new licenses and allowing units approved before the moratorium to
proceed.
SB 734, Regulatory Reform Act of
2014. SB 734 is the non-Health and Safety
regulatory reform bill. SB 734 proposes elimination of several boards and
commissions (the version approved this week no longer includes the Innocence
Commission); clarifies the process for rules re-adoption; provides for
electronic filing with the Office of Administrative Hearings; directs a study
of service of process in eviction proceedings; and provides that swimming pools
must be accessible if required by the ADA and directs the Building Code Council
to adopt rules consistent with the ADA, among other provisions.
Voting
SB 403, Omnibus Election Clarifications (Bingham). SB 403 makes a number of changes to the voting laws, including a clarification to ensure that the failure of a witness to an absentee ballot to list a zip code does not invalidate the application and certificate. It was approved by the full House this week. Instead of taking a concurrence vote on the Senate floor, the Senate sent the bill to the Senate Rules committee.
Voting
SB 403, Omnibus Election Clarifications (Bingham). SB 403 makes a number of changes to the voting laws, including a clarification to ensure that the failure of a witness to an absentee ballot to list a zip code does not invalidate the application and certificate. It was approved by the full House this week. Instead of taking a concurrence vote on the Senate floor, the Senate sent the bill to the Senate Rules committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We are eager to hear your feedback on our policy blog posts! However, we would like to ask that conversation remain civil. Avoid offensive, vulgar or hateful language and please be respectful of all viewpoints and opinions, even if they may differ from your own. We do not monitor each and every posting, but we reserve the right to delete comments that violate our policy.