Wednesday, October 13, 2010

October 13 NC Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services

Below are some highlights from the meeting today of the Legislative Oversight Committee for MH/DD/SAS. The handouts are on the LOC website at http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/DocumentSites/browseDocSite.asp?nID=20&sFolderName=\LOC Minutes and Handouts\Minutes and Handouts 2010\October 13, 2010 (Note that they did not get to the CAP-MR/DD Update).


Rep. Insko chaired the meeting, Sen Nesbitt absent

Secretary Cansler not there so he did not make remarks

Dr Gray Expenditures & Utilization (Handout)

• Child Day treatment down, stricter policy criteria and increased staffing reqs

• Moving in more clinically oriented direction

• CST: 25-40% denial rate by VO per month per clinical criteria

• Mobile Crisis – is it really diverting people from ER? They will f/u with data

• CAP Waiver recipients have increased by 7%, non-waiver TCM recipients have decreased by 5% - providers now billing by weekly rate, hopefully will give more flexibility

• Braxton: how do we decide who gets care – from dollar standpoint or needs standpoint? Insko: how do we know we are doing more appropriate services? (My note: you need to assess need, design services to meet needs and plan within budget) Watson: can put max amount on services for adults and adjust rates

• Cost of CST should drop below the cost of ACT

• In context of ACA need to think about moving toward case rate rather than fee for service – case rate allows for more flexibility, and also looks at outcomes

SIS Pilot Project – Rose Burnette (Handout)

• FT staff person at DDTI working on pilot project

• 20 SIS assessors have been trained

• As of Oct 11, 895 assessments have been completed but have not met the numbers in the legislation

• An additional 175 children have been assessed by the tool is not normed for children – data is being included in the norming process

• All participants are volunteers

• Data so far indicates NC recipients have higher support needs as compared to other states

• Insko: 1 LME did a study on patient need and the amount of $ for their services – that study did not show a correlation

• Waiver TA to require SIS but would still do SIS and SNAP?

• Medicaid funding for assessment, negotiating fee for licensing and assessment tool

• Legislation says to assign people to waivers based on SIS assessment but LMEs don’t assign people to waivers, the state does

Independent Assessment – Beth Melcher (Handout)

• FY10 had over 40K new service recipients (Medicaid and iprs)

• Placed assessment within CABHA core services so no infrastructure for IA outside of CABHAs

• Proposed how to implement the legislation in a way that would not interfere with care – at point of service order, review of providers

• Draft plan focuses on duration or frequency for ACTT, CST, PSR, IIH, day treatment, inpatient or crisis (i.e., ACTT for greater than 18 months) – submitted to PAG, will be posted for 45 day comment period

Dix Update – Luckey Welsh (handout)

• To CRH: 60 dult admission, 11 adult long term; 54 forensic med/max and pretrial beds

• To Cherry: 30 long term

• Side note: Secretary plans to give official notice of hospital closure at Gov Ops committee meeting next week

• Reviewed budget shortfall info from last time – about $29 mil

• Insko: Dix appropriations a topic of much discussion during the budget process, in order to fund would have had to take money from other essential services

• Timeline for patient transfers – have moved patients in adult long term to CRH; Oct/Nov move patients in adult long term to Cherry, move clinical research unit (recent development), stop admission to inpatient pretrial eval (but continue outpatient evals – most are already outpatient); Dec move forensic max, stop admissions to DDH, move pretrial eval, move patients in forensic med, move remaining patients in adult admission – working with all hosps, DRNC on moves

• Goal to have completed by December 23

• Cost to operate remaining units on Dix – Child Outpatient and Forensic Min - $9 mil

• Additional 19 adult admission beds at Broughton $2.9 mil

• Division estimates $16.9 mil savings by closing Dix beds

• Investigating employee transportation from Raleigh to CRH

• Insko: HHS budget chairs met with Cansler yesterday and he said that they are maintaining enough at the hospital to bring back up if GA says they want to remain open; discussed how NC overutilizes inpatient beds in large institutions

• Watson – moving toward plan to have 3 regions with 3 hospitals

• Barnhart: Another $3-4 bil shortfall this year; Effects Wake county more than other places; losing jobs everywhere – employees may have to commute but most jobs preserved; have to make hard decisions the next few years; not losing beds

• Braxton: need to consider increasing population (my note: not taking into account current overutilization); Luckey: new Cherry and Broughton have additional capacity

• Had been a plan to open forensic beds at Broughton and that hasn’t happened.

Health Reform – Pam Silberman, IOM (Handout)

• Good Overview for DRNC folks

• Pam highlighted:

o special outreach requirements to people with mental health or addictive disorders

o prevention and wellness – funds for a prevention and public health fund – mh, behavioral health and substance abuse disorder included priority areas

o Efforts to expand health professional workforce, including specifically mh and addiction licensed health professionals

o Expand National Health Service Corps

o Quality Improvement; comparative effectiveness research

o New models of care to improve quality and efficiency, i.e., reverse co-location (primary care provider in community mental health agencies), Medicaid emergency psychiatric coverage in IMDs

o Expansion of community health centers (NC has applied for funding to expand community health centers)

o CLASS

o Options to expand HCBS to achieve an enhanced match rate – Community First Choice Option and state balancing initiative

• Impact on People with MH/DD/SAS Conditions

o Expanded insurance coverage

o Essential benefits plans should include preventative services related to MH/SA

o Many people now receiving state funded services through LME will now have Medicaid or private insurance coverage – LMEs still have role in authorizing services to people who lack insurance coverage, authorizing wrap-around services and in UM

o There will still be a role in state financing for gaps

o Question: what is the role of the LME in the new system?

o No mention of the revised 1915(i) waiver option

• Youth Villages Transitional Living Program, Youth Villages & Guilford Center (Handout)

o Program targets kids coming out of foster care with behavioral health issues

o In NC average daily census 55 kids/day; target number about 400 kids/year

o 10 locations across NC

o Doing clinical trials in TN to compare outcomes; now can compare to national outcomes

Public Comment Portion

• Union member discussed OAH decisions overturning employee terminations, Dix closure, disproportionate effect on black workers

• Louise Jordan spoke in favor of keeping Dix open, no part of discussion is person-centered, only budget centered

• Beverly Moriarty, Dix nurse – declining admissions because all hospitals on delay; reform didn’t happen, we don’t have community services, patients not being treated, building new hospitals in wrong places and staffing shortage

• Current temp psychiatrist at Dix – Dix long term care has better outcomes than other hospitals

Effectiveness of Single Stream Funding, Steve Jordan (Handout)

• Report submitted to GA August 31, 2010

• Put monitoring in place to ensure some maintenance of effort for individual disability services

• Allows LMEs to use funds for projects to fill gaps

• Looking at expenditure comparisons, LMEs spending closer to allocation, increased SA spending significantly

• Majors programming – managing access for juvenile justice – 15 year old JJ initiative to screen, identify and provide treatment for young people with SA issues
Next Meeting November 9th

No comments:

Post a Comment

We are eager to hear your feedback on our policy blog posts! However, we would like to ask that conversation remain civil. Avoid offensive, vulgar or hateful language and please be respectful of all viewpoints and opinions, even if they may differ from your own. We do not monitor each and every posting, but we reserve the right to delete comments that violate our policy.